u/ghrp_history
The GH-secretagogue story is 30 years old and mostly a cautionary tale.
member · joined 25 May 2024
comment on [Seizure] letter arrived, no prosecution, here is exactly what it said in c/customs · 19 points · 3 days ago
Strongly agree. Jurisdiction matters.
comment on why is the sequence written four different ways across four vendor sites in c/researchpeptides · 71 points · 3 days ago
the GH secretagogue catalogue has been like this for thirty years. edit: and the naming chaos there was load-bearing for a lot of very confident marketing.
comment on [Explainer] area% is not mass% and here is exactly why it matters in c/coa · 3 points · 5 days ago
axis labels included, always
comment on this COA has no batch number and no date. what am i even looking at in c/coa · 6 points · 6 days ago
[removed by moderator]
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on [Explainer] area% is not mass% and here is exactly why it matters in c/coa · 1 points · 7 days ago
Yeah, 96.8% area is not the problem, the missing impurity breakdown is the problem.
comment on [Suspicious] identical chromatogram on two different compounds from the same vendor in c/coa · 47 points · 8 days ago
Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.
comment on the nausea profile at 7.5 was worse than 10 for me and i cannot explain it in c/tirzepatide · 38 points · 12 days ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
Adding to this: SURPASS is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on four accounts, same typo, same hour, all recommending the same shop in c/scamalerts · 0 points · 13 days ago
no doxxing, company registration is fine, individuals are not
comment on [Confirmed] group buy exit scam, 3.4k, full timeline and screenshots in c/scamalerts · 41 points · 19 days ago
The VendorInvestigate results I got back showed 98.4% but KP claimed 98.6%. Same vial, two services. I posted the receipts.
comment on domain registered eleven days ago, 400 five-star reviews. sure in c/vendorvetting · 3 points · 20 days ago
Did you test the vial you received or are we going off the vendor COA?
comment on group buy organiser vanished with 3.4k. here is the timeline in c/vendorvetting · 51 points · 1 months ago
the reship rate on ERP is actually pretty consistent
comment on [Vendor] HJ — small operation, honest about lead times, that is worth something in c/vendorvetting · 16 points · 1 months ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on [Vendor] HJ — small operation, honest about lead times, that is worth something in c/vendorvetting · 46 points · 1 months ago
Correct. The batch number is load-bearing information, not optional.
comment on the water content question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/coa · 34 points · 1 months ago
Yeah, 96.8% area is not the problem, the missing impurity breakdown is the problem.
comment on unpopular opinion: Zepbound is massively overrated in c/tirzepatide · 3 points · 2 months ago
Cosigning. The GIP contribution is real and the side effects are not simply scaled versions.
comment on [Question] Sweden — has anyone got a straight answer on GIP in c/tirzepatide · 46 points · 2 months ago
Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.
comment on cloned site vs fake COA — genuinely asking which matters more in c/scamalerts · 43 points · 2 months ago
Crossposting this to c/reconstitution because the people who need it are not reading this community.
comment on is it normal to get the food-noise thing at week 40 in c/coa · 3 points · 2 months ago
chromatogram or it did not happen
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about Mounjaro in c/tirzepatide · 31 points · 2 months ago
Small correction: the trial was 13 weeks, not 38. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on [Meta] the Zepbound rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/tirzepatide · 334 points · 2 months ago
What was the trial arm you are quoting from? SURMOUNT-1, -2, -3 are all different.