this COA has no batch number and no date. what am i even looking at
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.
The claim: COA matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 15 months without either producing anything.
What would actually settle it is 15 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.
If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.
best — the order this archive was captured in
the counterion is part of the mass you paid for
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
Cosigning. The batch number is load-bearing information.
chromatogram or it did not happen
Yeah, 96.8% area is not the problem, the missing impurity breakdown is the problem.
the counterion is part of the mass you paid for
axis labels included, always
[removed by moderator]
[removed by moderator]
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
no "is this good?" without saying what the compound and claimed purity are
- 1nobody says this and everybody needs to hear it7 comments in this branch · started by u/stablecoin_steve
- 2the counterion is part of the mass you paid for4 comments in this branch · started by u/priya_palacios