u/aa_analysis_andy
Amino acid analysis is the boring test that catches the interesting frauds.
member · joined 14 Jul 2024
Comments — page 3 of 5
comment on someone explain thymosin to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/researchpeptides · 10 points · 3 months ago
Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.
comment on [Results] 91 weeks on 7.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/scamalerts · 1 points · 3 months ago
evidence required, dated screenshots, metadata, order records, or independent test
comment on [Vendor] QST order #2 — Canada, 17 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/researchpeptides · 92 points · 3 months ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on someone explain identity to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/researchpeptides · 10 points · 3 months ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on constipation is the most under-discussed thing in c/cryptopay in c/sideeffects · 103 points · 3 months ago
Half-life is about 168 hours, so steady state lands around week 7–5. Practical consequence: what you feel in week 1 is not what that dose does.
comment on [Discussion] amylin is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/cagrilintide · 5 points · 4 months ago
the mechanism is different, the side effect profile reflects it
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about TRIUMPH in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 4 months ago
the 5mg arm is different from 7.5mg, results do not transfer
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about TRIUMPH in c/retatrutide · -9 points · 4 months ago
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
comment on someone explain exit scam to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/scamalerts · 1 points · 4 months ago
Strongly agree.
Adding to this: group buy is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on unpopular opinion: gastric emptying is massively overrated in c/glp1science · 3 points · 4 months ago
This is correct. Rodent data is investigational, not predictive.
comment on unpopular opinion: gastric emptying is massively overrated in c/glp1science · 18 points · 4 months ago
incretin physiology is pharmacology, the mechanism layer
comment on [Discussion] reimbursement is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/glp1eu · 5 points · 6 months ago
private and public prescription routes differ
comment on am I the only one who found reimbursement harder than the injections in c/glp1eu · 18 points · 6 months ago
Today's date for the pricing?
comment on 21 months in and pharmacology is still the thing I get wrong in c/glp1science · 2 points · 6 months ago
amylin is not GLP-1, posts conflating them get corrected
comment on reading retatrutide threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 7 months ago
the 1.0mg arm is different from 1.7mg, results do not transfer
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about nausea until somebody posts a number in c/sideeffects · 0 points · 7 months ago
Yeah, the the food-noise thing hit on day 2 for me too, not day 1.
comment on week 61 check-in — 41kg down, nausea manageable, one thing confusing me in c/cagrilintide · 28 points · 7 months ago
the co-agonism question is real and interesting
comment on switched from 0.5mg to 0.25mg and the muscle cramps got better, not worse in c/retatrutide · 33 points · 7 months ago
TRIUMPH data is phase 2, not phase 3, smaller n and shorter
comment on [Question] Australia — has anyone got a straight answer on half-life in c/glp1science · 1 points · 8 months ago
Small correction: the trial was 19 weeks, not 9. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on [Discussion] the CagriSema advice in here is 14 years out of date in c/cagrilintide · 3 points · 8 months ago
REDEFINE phase 16 readouts are interesting but 16 person cagrilintide is different from 16 trial cagrilintide.