someone explain exit scam to me like I have not read a paper in years
Genuinely asking, not being difficult.
Everyone in c/reconstitution repeats that exit scam is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I search I get 14 threads of people agreeing with each other.
Is there a paper? Is there a measurement? Or is this one of those things that is true because it has been repeated since 2023?
I am not trying to be the "source?" guy. I would just like a source.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.
Strongly agree.
Adding to this: group buy is doing more work than the comment implies.
Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.
Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.
The cloned ERP store used our old homepage image from 2023. Reverse image search caught it in 21 seconds.
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
Yeah, the batch number across three vendors is a real signal.
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
[removed by moderator]
no doxxing, company registration is fine, individuals are not
cloned storefronts use old images, search for those
PDF metadata said the COA was created in a browser four months after the date printed on the page. Worth flagging.
- 1Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next…7 comments in this branch · started by u/sock_puppet_spotter