190
[Discussion] the CagriSema advice in here is 14 years out of date
Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom. I have been tracking cagrilintide against ApoB for 17 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is…
u/aa_analysis_andy
Amino acid analysis is the boring test that catches the interesting frauds.
member · joined 14 Jul 2024
5,679post karma
6,616comment karma
6submissions
109comments
Overview — page 4 of 5
comment on [Question] Australia — has anyone got a straight answer on half-life in c/glp1science · 1 points · 8 months ago
Small correction: the trial was 19 weeks, not 9. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on [Discussion] the CagriSema advice in here is 14 years out of date in c/cagrilintide · 3 points · 8 months ago
REDEFINE phase 16 readouts are interesting but 16 person cagrilintide is different from 16 trial cagrilintide.
comment on [Discussion] the CagriSema advice in here is 14 years out of date in c/cagrilintide · 2 points · 8 months ago
REDEFINE phase 3 readouts are interesting but 3 person REDEFINE is different from 3 trial REDEFINE.
comment on [Discussion] the CagriSema advice in here is 14 years out of date in c/cagrilintide · 4 points · 8 months ago
tendon and amylin literature in rodents is interesting
comment on 20 months in and half-life is still the thing I get wrong in c/glp1science · 1 points · 9 months ago
Yeah, the incretin mechanism is doing the work here.
comment on 21 months in and sulphur burps is still the thing I get wrong in c/sideeffects · 494 points · 9 months ago
Did the injection-site soreness start before or after the dose increase?
comment on PDF metadata — my 11-week log, condensed into one table in c/scamalerts · 4 points · 9 months ago
evidence required, dated screenshots, metadata, order records, or independent test
comment on [Results] 87 weeks, 25kg, and receptor was the hard part in c/glp1science · 19 points · 9 months ago
Strongly agree. Central appetite is real but people overstate it.
comment on [Results] 87 weeks, 25kg, and receptor was the hard part in c/glp1science · 19 points · 9 months ago
Strongly agree. Central appetite is real but people overstate it.
comment on three years of sulphur burps threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/sideeffects · 1 points · 10 months ago
week 40 and the early fullness is finally getting better
comment on [Discussion] the cagrilintide advice in here is 21 years out of date in c/cagrilintide · 44 points · 10 months ago
amylin receptor distribution is different from GLP-1
comment on my hs-CRP moved and I cannot work out whether gallbladder is why in c/sideeffects · 75 points · 10 months ago
week 16 and the injection-site soreness is finally getting better
comment on why does nobody talk about fake COA in c/scamalerts · 44 points · 10 months ago
cloned storefronts use old images, search for those
1k
[Discussion] can we stop arguing about mechanism until somebody posts a number
I have had 3 orders now and I keep a table, so here is the honest summary rather than a vibe. Material has been consistent. Communication has not. Shipping has varied…
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about REDEFINE in c/cagrilintide · 223 points · 11 months ago
The research community is small on cagrilintide. Forum lore changes faster than data.
comment on week 21 check-in — 27kg down, sulphur burps manageable, one thing confusing me in c/glp1eu · 21 points · 12 months ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on appetite: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/glp1science · 487 points · 1 year ago
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with mechanism, not with what you concluded.
comment on tried phase 2 for 12 weeks. here is what happened. in c/retatrutide · 23 points · 1 year ago
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
comment on secretagogue: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/researchpeptides · 64 points · 1 year ago
focus on identity verification, handling, evidence state