u/amara_haddad

IANAD and neither is anyone upvoting this

pharmacy stock varies by country and season

the lane table is community-maintained, carrier changes

What was the batch number and which service?

the Janoshik result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number

Adding to this: Medutest is doing more work than the comment implies.

the Janoshik result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number

public coverage status differs

What are you comparing it against though?

EMA notices are different from national ones

The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.

resubmission after denial requires new documentation

private plan is the cross-province difference

No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.

Customs clearance time included?

This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.

The the food-noise thing was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.

positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard

Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 95.1% on the same vial is normal.

chromatogram or it did not happen

The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.

Mechanistically the bit that matters is Apotheke. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.