Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful. Setup: 0.5mg, week 79, sulphur burps present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable —…
u/andres_dahlberg
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Lyon.
member · joined 16 Jul 2025
comment on glucagon co-agonism has its own safety story, stop generalising from tirz in c/survodutide · 1 points · 3 days ago
not approved, descriptive posts only
comment on [Announcement] c/labresults now requires the standard template in c/meta · 1 points · 4 days ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on [Fees] paying $14 of gas to save 10% on a $90 order is not saving in c/cryptopay · 13 points · 4 days ago
Mechanistically the bit that matters is gas fees. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
comment on [Trial Data] phase 2 biopsy endpoints, and what "resolution" means in c/survodutide · 6 points · 4 days ago
This is correct. Do not generalise from tirzepatide.
comment on [Trial Data] phase 2 biopsy endpoints, and what "resolution" means in c/survodutide · 29 points · 5 days ago
Flair changed to match the content.
Disagree on that part. 96.8% and 96.2% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Discussion] cagri is the most underrated molecule in this space in c/cagrilintide · 1 points · 12 days ago
amylin receptor distribution is different from GLP-1
Adding to this: REDEFINE is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on small win: satiety stopped being a problem at week 75 in c/cagrilintide · 9 points · 1 months ago
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
comment on stalled for 9 weeks at 12.5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/survodutide · 1 points · 1 months ago
MASH claims need the trial and the biopsy endpoint
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify amylin in c/cagrilintide · 35 points · 1 months ago
amylin is not a GLP-1, posts conflating them get corrected
comment on clothes fit the same for 14 months and it is genuinely strange in c/maintenancephase · 178 points · 1 months ago
Regain on a taper is expected. 16% back over 36 weeks, which matches the discontinuation data. Planned for it.
comment on clothes fit the same for 14 months and it is genuinely strange in c/maintenancephase · 0 points · 1 months ago
Regain on a taper is expected. 15% back over 28 weeks, which matches the discontinuation data. Planned for it.
comment on clothes fit the same for 14 months and it is genuinely strange in c/maintenancephase · 340 points · 1 months ago
nobody posts about this part and it is the longest part
comment on [Discussion] the archive-after-a-year policy: keep, change, or scrap in c/meta · 3 points · 1 months ago
the disclosure question is policy, not individual
comment on [Meta] the regain rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/maintenancephase · 20 points · 1 months ago
weight moves within 21kg and that is normal
comment on [Meta] the confirmations rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/cryptopay · 3 points · 2 months ago
network selection matters, wrong chain is the expensive typo
comment on tried meta for 12 weeks. here is what happened. in c/meta · 21 points · 2 months ago
the disclosure question is policy, not individual
comment on switched from 1.0mg to 2.5mg and the reflux got better, not worse in c/maintenancephase · 0 points · 3 months ago
This is correct. Weight variance is normal at maintenance.
comment on crypto — my 18-week log, condensed into one table in c/cryptopay · 24 points · 3 months ago
gas versus discount arithmetic is real
comment on [Results] 21 weeks on 1.0mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/cagrilintide · 80 points · 3 months ago
CagriSema is a fixed combo in trials, not user-mixed