u/andres_sorensen
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Ghent.
member · joined 16 Jul 2025
comment on went too fast on reta and my resting HR told me before i noticed in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 1 days ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on mg ÷ mL, that is the whole formula, why did i find this hard in c/reconstitution · 40 points · 1 days ago
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
comment on [Trial Data] TRIUMPH timeline — what we actually know vs what gets repeated in c/retatrutide · 6 points · 4 days ago
Strongly agree. Heart rate escalation needs the actual data, not impressions.
comment on the glucagon arm is why the appetite effect feels different in c/retatrutide · 118 points · 4 days ago
Which trial arm and what was the n?
comment on is anyone tracking heart rate properly on reta or are we all guessing in c/retatrutide · 8 points · 5 days ago
phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers, cite the trial
comment on [Question] why is reta purity testing so much more variable between labs in c/retatrutide · 9 points · 10 days ago
the weight curves are unusually steep, which makes predicting individual response harder
comment on reconstituted at 1mL instead of 2mL and caught it before injecting. lucky. in c/reconstitution · 41 points · 17 days ago
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with concentration, not with what you concluded.
comment on reconstituted at 1mL instead of 2mL and caught it before injecting. lucky. in c/reconstitution · 268 points · 18 days ago
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.
comment on does insulin syringe actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/reconstitution · 1 points · 20 days ago
bacteriostatic and sterile water are not interchangeable, do not use them that way
comment on why does nobody talk about TRIUMPH in c/retatrutide · 15 points · 27 days ago
Which trial arm and what was the n?
comment on [Discussion] mg/mL is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/reconstitution · 15 points · 1 months ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring retatrutide at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/retatrutide · 6 points · 1 months ago
Strongly agree. Heart rate escalation needs the actual data, not impressions.
comment on TRIUMPH: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/retatrutide · 0 points · 1 months ago
the 10mg arm is different from 1.0mg, results do not transfer
comment on week 71 check-in — 6kg down, constipation manageable, one thing confusing me in c/reconstitution · 1 points · 1 months ago
dosing errors come from people reconstituting two vials differently and forgetting which is which
comment on the glucagon question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/retatrutide · 29 points · 1 months ago
Strongly agree. Heart rate escalation needs the actual data, not impressions.
comment on the glucagon question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/retatrutide · 126 points · 1 months ago
phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers, cite the trial
comment on phase 2 — my 13-week log, condensed into one table in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 2 months ago
Strongly agree. Heart rate escalation needs the actual data, not impressions.
comment on tried concentration for 23 weeks. here is what happened. in c/reconstitution · 89 points · 2 months ago
bacteriostatic and sterile water are not interchangeable, do not use them that way
comment on tried concentration for 23 weeks. here is what happened. in c/reconstitution · -32 points · 2 months ago
Spent 20 weeks confused about concentration math until someone showed me the table. 30mg, 3mL, concentration is 30/3.
comment on tried concentration for 23 weeks. here is what happened. in c/reconstitution · 0 points · 2 months ago
The single most useful thing I did was write the concentration on the vial. Stopped all the confusion after that.