first time. That is the whole post, but I will justify it. Everything else people worry about in c/scamalerts is downstream of it. Titration speed, muscle cramps, the…
u/aurel_mwangi
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Oulu.
member · joined 13 Apr 2025
Overview — page 4 of 5
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for customs posts in c/customs · 57 points · 10 months ago
Week 17 for me and the honest summary is: 45kg down, constipation manageable, and I have thought about food maybe four times today.
comment on week 91 check-in — 37kg down, early fullness manageable, one thing confusing me in c/trialwatch · 1 points · 10 months ago
Which trial and what was the primary endpoint?
comment on [Discussion] the gallbladder advice in here is 17 years out of date in c/sideeffects · 61 points · 11 months ago
nausea on day 2 is normal, nausea after week 92 is worth checking
comment on my ApoB moved and I cannot work out whether purity is why in c/labresults · 6 points · 11 months ago
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
comment on fatigue: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/sideeffects · 143 points · 11 months ago
This is correct. The constipation is horrible for three weeks and then just ends.
comment on switched from 5mg to 2.5mg and the sulphur burps got better, not worse in c/newbiequestions · 261 points · 1 year ago
Week 13 checking in: nothing on the scale, no nausea, wondering if the pen is broken. No, it is just week 13.
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #10 — the Netherlands, 23 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/maintenancephase · 30 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, maintenance is the boring part and the important part.
comment on switched from 1.0mg to 0.5mg and the constipation got better, not worse in c/labresults · 257 points · 1 year ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on unpopular opinion: beginner is massively overrated in c/newbiequestions · 0 points · 1 year ago
be kind, condescending answers are removed
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about constipation in c/sideeffects · 1 points · 1 year ago
Has anything else changed?
Disagree on that part. 98.0% and 98.1% on the same vial is normal.
comment on does below spec actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/labresults · 46 points · 1 year ago
The Medutest result at 97.4% was below the 98.3% claim. MKM retested at their cost and came back 97.4%. Logged as resolved.
comment on does below spec actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/labresults · 206 points · 1 year ago
The VendorInvestigate result at 98.4% was below the 96.8% claim. GL Biochem retested at their cost and came back 98.4%. Logged as resolved.
comment on does below spec actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/labresults · 373 points · 1 year ago
template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result
Disagree on that part. 95.1% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.
batch. That is the whole post, but I will justify it. Everything else people worry about in c/coa is downstream of it. Titration speed, muscle cramps, the endless dose…
comment on three years of declared value threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/customs · 49 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, Poland rules are not global.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify sulphur burps in c/sideeffects · 318 points · 1 year ago
IANAD and neither is anyone upvoting this
comment on am I the only one who found lowest effective dose harder than the injections in c/maintenancephase · 17 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. Lowest effective dose is a real discovery process.
comment on three years of SELECT threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/trialwatch · 1 points · 1 year ago
STEP, SURMOUNT, SURPASS, SELECT, FLOW, TRIUMPH — read the appendix
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #14 — France, 7 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/sideeffects · 14 points · 1 year ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.