u/britt_zamora

Sceptical.

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

independent test or vendor COA, which is it

focus on identity verification, handling, evidence state

independent test or vendor COA, which is it

vendor staff must self-identify, full stop

Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.

Small correction: the trial was 20 weeks, not 13. Does not change your point but people will quote it.

PDF metadata said the COA was created in a browser four months after the date printed on the page.

Adding to this: fraud is doing more work than the comment implies.

Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.

the reship rate on TFC is actually pretty consistent

the 3-letter analogs are speculative

This order history matches mine almost exactly.

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.

Week 12 checking in: nothing on the scale, no nausea, wondering if the pen is broken. No, it is just week 12.

This is a good question, genuinely.

referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions

focus on identity verification, handling, evidence state

How many orders from ERP is that a sample of? One reship is noise, five is a pattern.

receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule