u/cardio_endpoint_c

This is correct.

Adding to this: lipids is doing more work than the comment implies.

copay is separate from coverage

ApoB over LDL-C, that is the hierarchy

Adding to this: ALT is doing more work than the comment implies.

the Spain answer is not the Spain answer

redact member ids and group numbers from every screenshot

This is correct. Appeal letters work.

do not suggest misrepresenting a diagnosis, that is fraud

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 24 weeks to accept.

side effects that ended someone's run

Slight fix: the number was 99.2, not 99.1.

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

Did anything else change in the same window?

10mg vial, 1mL water, concentration is 10/1 — write it on the vial afterwards

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with formulary, not with what you concluded.

This is correct. 1mL versus 23mL is the common mistake.

Came off after 93 weeks for financial reasons. Regained about a third over the following year. Back on now at a much lower dose.

Slight fix: the number was 93.7, not 99.3. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

Baseline ferritin: 98.3. Week 89: 97.9. Same lab, fasted, same time of day. Trend matters.

ALT is where the fatty-liver story shows up first

This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.