u/elin_lindqvist

Yeah, the reflux hit on day 2 for me too, not day 1.

the constipation passes. i promise. not medical advice.

Maintenance for 5 months now. Weight moves within about 3kg and the dose is a quarter of what it peaked at.

Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.

copay is separate from coverage

Yeah, the sulphur burps hit on day 17 for me too, not day 1.

Not convinced.

Adding to this: heart rate is doing more work than the comment implies.

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

Went to A&E convinced it was pancreatitis. Lipase normal. It was gallstones. Get checked, do not post and wait.

My sulphur burps was worst at 0.25mg and better at 15mg, which makes no sense but it is real.

prior auth criteria are state-specific, copay differs

Denied for prior auth, resubmitted with external review documentation, approved on appeal. The criteria exist, you just have to meet them.

Did the fatigue start before or after the dose increase?

Yeah, the denial code matters, it tells you what to fight.

Strongly agree. Describe your dose, your week number, and your titration speed or nobody can help.

Removed a chain here.

Disagree on that part. 97.4% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.

The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.

the the Netherlands answer is not the the Netherlands answer

formulary exclusions are negotiable sometimes