Delayed gastric emptying explains most of the GI story and half the satiety story.
member · joined 27 Sep 2024
Overview — page 4 of 5
comment on tried STEP for 14 weeks. here is what happened. in c/trialwatch · 120 points · 7 months ago
What was the dropout rate?
comment on someone explain non-scale victory to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/progresspics · 32 points · 7 months ago
the community is deliberately image-free
comment on someone explain non-scale victory to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/progresspics · 32 points · 7 months ago
The thing nobody prepared me for was the quiet. Not the appetite, the quiet. The constant negotiation in my head about food just stopped.
comment on someone explain non-scale victory to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/progresspics · 12 points · 7 months ago
8 months, 41kg, non-scale victory
I have had 20 orders now and I keep a table, so here is the honest summary rather than a vibe. Material has been consistent. Communication has not. Shipping has varied…
comment on reading SURPASS threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/trialwatch · 64 points · 8 months ago
number-needed-to-treat is the house dialect
comment on [PSA] receptor is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/glp1science · 133 points · 8 months ago
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
comment on 20 months in and half-life is still the thing I get wrong in c/glp1science · 1 points · 9 months ago
mechanistic speculation is welcome if flaired as speculation
comment on FLOW vs TRIUMPH — genuinely asking which matters more in c/trialwatch · 21 points · 9 months ago
Mechanistically the bit that matters is SELECT. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
comment on small win: PDF metadata stopped being a problem at week 40 in c/scamalerts · -25 points · 9 months ago
Which order and did you have any communication from SGN?
comment on [Results] 87 weeks, 25kg, and receptor was the hard part in c/glp1science · 21 points · 9 months ago
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
comment on tried gastric emptying for 14 weeks. here is what happened. in c/glp1science · 318 points · 10 months ago
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
comment on pharmacy vs prescription — genuinely asking which matters more in c/glp1eu · 14 points · 10 months ago
Today's date for the pricing?
comment on three years of cloned site threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/scamalerts · 143 points · 11 months ago
This is evidence. The metadata is checkable and it is odd.
comment on genuine question about appetite that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/glp1science · 20 points · 11 months ago
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
comment on genuine question about appetite that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/glp1science · 38 points · 11 months ago
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
comment on help me understand endpoint, I have read the wiki twice in c/trialwatch · 19 points · 12 months ago
phase 2 is not phase 3, smaller n and shorter trial
comment on appetite: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/glp1science · 99 points · 1 year ago
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
comment on PDF metadata — 14 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/scamalerts · 1 points · 1 year ago
fake COAs always have the same tell: perfect results, zero variance
comment on the fraud question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/scamalerts · 8 points · 1 year ago
the reship offer that never sends anything is worth noting
Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.
janoshik.comSponsoredCustom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.
glbiochem.netSeveral compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.
Reference