u/gastric_emptying_g
Delayed gastric emptying explains most of the GI story and half the satiety story.
member · joined 27 Sep 2024
Overview — page 3 of 5
comment on help me understand fake COA, I have read the wiki twice in c/scamalerts · 7 points · 3 months ago
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
comment on Canada: endpoint, and what it actually costs here in c/trialwatch · 68 points · 3 months ago
Strongly agree. Phase 2 is investigational, not conclusive.
comment on reading exit scam threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/scamalerts · 147 points · 3 months ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on [Results] 62 weeks, 45kg, and FLOW was the hard part in c/trialwatch · 1 points · 4 months ago
the 12 week readout is different from the 14 week readout
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on [Question] gastric emptying — what am I missing here in c/glp1science · 1 points · 4 months ago
mechanistic speculation is welcome if flaired as speculation
comment on [Question] gastric emptying — what am I missing here in c/glp1science · 132 points · 4 months ago
Which paper are you quoting?
comment on someone explain exit scam to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/scamalerts · 4 points · 4 months ago
cloned storefronts use old images, search for those
comment on unpopular opinion: gastric emptying is massively overrated in c/glp1science · 66 points · 4 months ago
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
comment on milestone is the most under-discussed thing in c/bloodwork in c/progresspics · 19 points · 5 months ago
the community is deliberately image-free
comment on small win: fake COA stopped being a problem at week 55 in c/scamalerts · 36 points · 5 months ago
fake COAs always have the same tell: perfect results, zero variance
comment on the half-life question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/glp1science · 1 points · 5 months ago
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
comment on nobody warned me about nausea and I would have liked the warning in c/coa · 155 points · 5 months ago
the batch number or it did not happen
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on [Discussion] reimbursement is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/glp1eu · 7 points · 6 months ago
Which country? Rules differ.
comment on anyone else notice progress kicking in around week 89 in c/progresspics · 0 points · 6 months ago
Yeah, text-only removes the comparison.
comment on stalled for 22 weeks at 1.0mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/coa · 15 points · 6 months ago
redact your own name, not the vendor's batch details
comment on genuine question about SELECT that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/trialwatch · 1 points · 6 months ago
off-label use data is different from approved-indication data
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 95 weeks to accept.
comment on 21 months in and pharmacology is still the thing I get wrong in c/glp1science · 0 points · 6 months ago
glucagon-receptor contribution is half-life for dual and triple agonism
comment on my hs-CRP moved and I cannot work out whether FLOW is why in c/trialwatch · 14 points · 7 months ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
comment on the COA thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/coa · 0 points · 7 months ago
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
comment on tried STEP for 14 weeks. here is what happened. in c/trialwatch · 8 points · 7 months ago
give the trial name, phase, n, and primary endpoint in the body