u/georgi_chowdhury

the GIP side does different things than the GLP-1 side, that is the point

Rodent or human data?

is this normal week 15 — yes, probably

Yeah, the chromatogram profile matters more than the headline number.

What was the column and what gradient?

CagriSema ratios in trials are fixed, do not extrapolate self-mixing

Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.

link the wiki instead of retyping, but politely

Rodent or human data?

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

the first time question is not dumb

No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.

area% and mass% are not the same and this whole post conflates them

Where does the receptor data actually come from?

do not editorialise in the title, put the number in the title and the opinion in the body

testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts

I am going to push back on this slightly.

a round-robin on baseline integration would be genuinely useful

I am going to push back on this slightly.

SURMOUNT data is messier than STEP data but the weight loss is there