2.1k
Janoshik is the most under-discussed thing in c/sideeffects
Right, the PeptideMeter question again, but with numbers this time. I have 4 data points over 20 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is…
u/georgi_chowdhury
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Bologna.
member · joined 17 Aug 2025
3,246post karma
7,161comment karma
2submissions
108comments
Overview — page 4 of 5
comment on tried method development for 12 weeks. here is what happened. in c/hplc · 1 points · 1 year ago
What was the column and what gradient?
comment on reading Zepbound threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/tirzepatide · 3 points · 1 year ago
the GIP side does different things than the GLP-1 side, that is the point
comment on the CagriSema question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/cagrilintide · 33 points · 1 year ago
Rodent or human data?
comment on [Question] Australia — has anyone got a straight answer on what is in c/newbiequestions · 45 points · 1 year ago
is this normal week 15 — yes, probably
comment on tried purity for 20 weeks. here is what happened. in c/hplc · 5 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, the chromatogram profile matters more than the headline number.
comment on tried purity for 20 weeks. here is what happened. in c/hplc · 29 points · 1 year ago
What was the column and what gradient?
comment on CagriSema vs REDEFINE — genuinely asking which matters more in c/cagrilintide · 1 points · 1 year ago
CagriSema ratios in trials are fixed, do not extrapolate self-mixing
comment on CagriSema vs REDEFINE — genuinely asking which matters more in c/cagrilintide · 48 points · 1 year ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on genuine question about week one that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/newbiequestions · 24 points · 1 year ago
link the wiki instead of retyping, but politely
comment on switched from 1.7mg to 5mg and the muscle cramps got better, not worse in c/cagrilintide · 52 points · 1 year ago
Rodent or human data?
comment on chromatogram: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/hplc · 31 points · 1 year ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
comment on reading first time threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/newbiequestions · 16 points · 1 year ago
the first time question is not dumb
comment on basics vs what is — genuinely asking which matters more in c/newbiequestions · 21 points · 1 year ago
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
comment on stalled for 10 weeks at 5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/hplc · 289 points · 1 year ago
area% and mass% are not the same and this whole post conflates them
comment on [Results] 66 weeks on 5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/glp1science · 24 points · 1 year ago
Where does the receptor data actually come from?
comment on switched from 1.0mg to 0.5mg and the early fullness got better, not worse in c/labresults · 18 points · 1 year ago
do not editorialise in the title, put the number in the title and the opinion in the body
comment on Janoshik is the most under-discussed thing in c/sideeffects in c/labresults · 27 points · 1 year ago
testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts
comment on Janoshik is the most under-discussed thing in c/sideeffects in c/labresults · 71 points · 1 year ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on my ApoB moved and I cannot work out whether method development is why in c/hplc · 1 points · 1 year ago
a round-robin on baseline integration would be genuinely useful