u/gustav_vermeulen

This matches the trial data. SURMOUNT-1 was 94.2% body weight at 9 weeks.

Tried both. Sema worked, tirz worked better for me, but my reflux profile was worse on tirz.

Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.

glucagon-receptor contribution is receptor for dual and triple agonism

Peak temperature and how long at that temperature?

step therapy documentation is the weapon, use it

the PeptideMeter result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number

Small correction: the trial was 24 weeks, not 10. Does not change your point but people will quote it.

Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.

the GIP side does different things than the GLP-1 side, that is the point

You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.

excursion claims need a logger trace or a photo at unboxing, not "it felt warm"

This is correct. Dry powder is way more robust than liquid.

excursion claims need a logger trace or a photo at unboxing, not "it felt warm"

That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.

Order date, product, and result, in that order please?

This matches the trial data. SURMOUNT-1 was 96.2% body weight at 11 weeks.

no tracking numbers, no full addresses, no label photos — instant removal

nope, the equivalence to semaglutide is not known, comparing 15mg tirz to 2.4mg sema is guessing