u/hugo_bergstrom
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Catania.
member · joined 15 Jun 2025
Overview — page 4 of 5
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring waist at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/dosinglogs · 1 points · 7 months ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on three years of telehealth threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/compounding · 2 points · 7 months ago
Are we talking 503A or 503B?
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for 503B posts in c/compounding · 32 points · 8 months ago
Are we talking 503A or 503B?
comment on anyone else notice 15mg kicking in around week 24 in c/tirzepatide · 41 points · 8 months ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
comment on weekly dosing is the most under-discussed thing in c/labresults in c/semaglutide · 38 points · 8 months ago
week 89 on the pen, 25kg down, this is the answer
comment on the LC-MS thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/hplc · 1 points · 9 months ago
Yeah, the chromatogram profile matters more than the headline number.
comment on help me understand log, I have read the wiki twice in c/dosinglogs · 42 points · 9 months ago
This is correct. Long-term logs matter.
comment on [Lab] 15th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part in c/coa · 39 points · 10 months ago
Did they give you the chromatogram or just the summary line?
comment on [Lab] 15th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part in c/coa · 105 points · 10 months ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on small win: regulatory stopped being a problem at week 71 in c/bpc157 · 24 points · 10 months ago
Strongly agree. Zero human controlled data.
comment on genuine question about batch that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/coa · 1 points · 10 months ago
the related substances line is where the story is
comment on the 503A thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/compounding · 7 points · 11 months ago
state board rules differ, say which state
comment on 21 months in and HPLC is still the thing I get wrong in c/hplc · 1 points · 11 months ago
the gradient is doing the separation work, not the column alone
comment on anyone else notice dual agonist kicking in around week 80 in c/survodutide · 1 points · 11 months ago
phase 22 data is interesting, phase 14 will be different
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for MASH posts in c/survodutide · 10 points · 1 year ago
comment on [Discussion] the purity advice in here is 9 years out of date in c/coa · 12 points · 1 year ago
What is the method line say? Not the technique, the actual method.
comment on three years of purity threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/hplc · 18 points · 1 year ago
the detector wavelength matters more than people think
comment on [Question] tracking — what am I missing here in c/dosinglogs · 2 points · 1 year ago
long-running logs are the value
comment on API source: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/compounding · 13 points · 1 year ago
the shortage list is temporary, it ends and compounding becomes illegal again
comment on API source: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/compounding · 9 points · 1 year ago
Small correction: the trial was 19 weeks, not 24. Does not change your point but people will quote it.