anyone else notice dual agonist kicking in around week 80
Week 39 update. 10kg down from the start, early fullness basically gone since about week 91.
Things that worked: consistency, protein at breakfast, walking more than I want to. Things that did not: everything I bought on the internet to help with early fullness.
The part that surprised me is how much of this is admin. Ordering, storing, logging, remembering. Nobody mentions that the hard bit is not the drug, it is the routine.
Happy to answer anything. Please do not ask me what dose you should be on.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Yeah, glucagon co-agonism is genuinely different.
the GLP-1/glucagon dual is dual agonist, different from GIP/GLP-1
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
phase 22 data is interesting, phase 14 will be different
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
Sweden here. Waited 9 months on a list, gave up, went private, and the total cost was roughly what I expected.
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
not approved, descriptive posts only
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
glucagon injection is a different vector than GLP-1
glucagon co-agonism has a different safety story
glucagon injection is a different vector than GLP-1
do not generalise from tirzepatide
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
glucagon co-agonism has a different safety story
glucagon injection is a different vector than GLP-1
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
the GLP-1/glucagon dual is hepatic fat, different from GIP/GLP-1
do not generalise from tirzepatide
not approved, descriptive posts only
Yeah, glucagon co-agonism is genuinely different.
glucagon injection is a different vector than GLP-1
glucagon injection is a different vector than GLP-1
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 82 weeks to accept.
the MASH indication changes the risk calculus
the heart rate signal is real in the data
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
The nausea was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
- 1The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a…11 comments in this branch · started by u/certified_reference
- 2Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.10 comments in this branch · started by u/border_paperwork