genuine question about batch that I am slightly embarrassed to ask
Week 21 update. 7kg down from the start, reflux basically gone since about week 61.
Things that worked: consistency, protein at breakfast, walking more than I want to. Things that did not: everything I bought on the internet to help with reflux.
The part that surprised me is how much of this is admin. Ordering, storing, logging, remembering. Nobody mentions that the hard bit is not the drug, it is the routine.
Happy to answer anything. Please do not ask me what dose you should be on.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
area% is not mass%, and here is exactly why it matters
no "is this good?" without saying what the compound and claimed purity are
purity and net content are two different numbers, same vial
Yeah, 96.8% area is not the problem, the missing impurity breakdown is the problem.
Yeah, 96.8% area is not the problem, the missing impurity breakdown is the problem.
Adding to this: certificate of analysis is doing more work than the comment implies.
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
Strongly agree. Mass% and area% are answering different questions on the same document.
post the whole document, not the headline number
Sceptical.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
the batch number or it did not happen
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with area percent, not with what you concluded.
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
the related substances line is where the story is
Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
the related substances line is where the story is
purity and net content are two different numbers, same vial
purity and net content are two different numbers, same vial
Disagree on that part. 98.4% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
the method line is doing real work, not just window dressing
- 1Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On…5 comments in this branch · started by u/cormac_pereira
- 2Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.4 comments in this branch · started by u/coa_collector