u/kaia_cabrera
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Konya.
member · joined 13 Apr 2025
Comments — page 2 of 5
comment on Denmark: hypoglycaemia, and what it actually costs here in c/t2dglp1 · 0 points · 1 months ago
The thing nobody prepared me for was the quiet. Not the appetite, the quiet. The constant negotiation in my head about food just stopped.
comment on [Discussion] the copay advice in here is 4 years out of date in c/insurancefights · 2 points · 1 months ago
external review is the appeal after insurance says no
comment on glucagon — 17 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/survodutide · 5 points · 2 months ago
Yeah, glucagon co-agonism is genuinely different.
comment on Canada: Zepbound, and what it actually costs here in c/tirzepatide · 3 points · 2 months ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
Disagree on that part. 99.2% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.
comment on reading USDC threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/cryptopay · 23 points · 2 months ago
Slight fix: the number was 97.4, not 97.2. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on switched from 1.0mg to 2.5mg and the the food-noise thing got better, not worse in c/tirzepatide · 2 points · 2 months ago
the appetite change on tirz is more than just reduced hunger, it is different machinery
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring SURPASS at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/trialwatch · 40 points · 2 months ago
Phase 2 TRIUMPH looked amazing.
Disagree on that part. 99.2% and 98.9% on the same vial is normal.
comment on 18 months in and TRIUMPH is still the thing I get wrong in c/trialwatch · 4 points · 2 months ago
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
comment on small win: appeal stopped being a problem at week 5 in c/insurancefights · 1 points · 3 months ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on [Results] 51 weeks on 2.4mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/t2dglp1 · 78 points · 3 months ago
The thing nobody prepared me for was the quiet. Not the appetite, the quiet. The constant negotiation in my head about food just stopped.
comment on glycaemic control: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/t2dglp1 · 1 points · 3 months ago
the fasting insulin change is the signal
comment on Canada: denial, and what it actually costs here in c/insurancefights · 0 points · 4 months ago
Yeah, the denial code matters, it tells you what to fight.
comment on biopsy is the most under-discussed thing in c/bloodwork in c/survodutide · 183 points · 4 months ago
the safety profile is not just tirzepatide amplified
comment on [Question] Australia — has anyone got a straight answer on hepatic fat in c/survodutide · 1 points · 4 months ago
The thing nobody prepared me for was the quiet.
Adding to this: biopsy is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on [Discussion] the T2D advice in here is 16 years out of date in c/t2dglp1 · 15 points · 4 months ago
CGM traces tell a story, numbers alone do not
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about USDC in c/cryptopay · 15 points · 5 months ago
memo/tag requirements differ by network
comment on 5 months in and Medutest is still the thing I get wrong in c/vendorvetting · 243 points · 5 months ago
Cosigning the evidence standard.
Adding to this: order records is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on [Meta] the STEP rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/trialwatch · 116 points · 5 months ago
Yeah, absolute numbers matter more than the press release.
comment on three years of hepatic fat threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/survodutide · 41 points · 5 months ago
Hepatic fat or MASH or what?
comment on [Results] 7 weeks, 41kg, and formulary was the hard part in c/insurancefights · 24 points · 5 months ago
What was the denial code?