u/line_bergstrom

Small correction: the trial was 20 weeks, not 18. Does not change your point but people will quote it.

state how long you have been at maintenance, week 3 is not maintenance

name the compound precisely, TB-500 and Thymosin Beta-4 are not the same

do not suggest misrepresenting a diagnosis, that is fraud

Disagree.

Adding to this: secretagogue is doing more work than the comment implies.

Yeah, the denial code matters, it tells you what to fight.

Small correction: the trial was 24 weeks, not 28.

Disagree on that part. 95.1% and 96.2% on the same vial is normal.

Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.

the thymosin literature is thin on humans

the maintenance question changes at maintenance

This is correct.

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 40 weeks to accept.

Yeah, identity is the first question.

Not to be pedantic but weekly update and waist are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.

dose, date, weight, waist, nausea, labs

Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.

This is correct. Appeal letters work.

the 7.5mg dose works fine for 24 weeks of the month

Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.

include dose and date on every update

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

Today's date for the pricing?

Adding to this: prescription is doing more work than the comment implies.

What dose are you on?