does regain actually matter or is it forum lore at this point
long term. That is the whole post, but I will justify it.
Everything else people worry about in c/hplc is downstream of it. Titration speed, muscle cramps, the endless dose arguments — most of it resolves if you sort long term out first, and almost nobody does.
I say this having got it wrong for 11 months. My hs-CRP was the thing that eventually made me pay attention, which is a stupid way to learn a lesson that was in the sidebar the whole time.
best — the order this archive was captured in
lowest effective dose is lowest effective dose, find it or stay higher
the plateau is where the learning happens
Maintenance for 7 months now. 2.4mg every 30 days, weight 11±7kg. Found the rhythm.
lowest effective dose is lowest effective dose, find it or stay higher
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
the plateau is where the learning happens
This is correct. Weight variance is normal at maintenance.
regain after taper is expected, plan for it
regain is not a moral failing
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
regain is not a moral failing
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
weight moves within 15kg and that is normal
the lowest dose you can stay on is not the lowest dose that works
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
state how long you have been at maintenance, week 3 is not maintenance
food noise returns but not always immediately
Strongly agree. Lowest effective dose is a real discovery process.
Mechanistically the bit that matters is regain. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
nobody posts about this part and it is the longest part
- 1regain is not a moral failing11 comments in this branch · started by u/hedda_aguirre
- 2lowest effective dose is lowest effective dose, find it or stay higher5 comments in this branch · started by u/usp_appendix