u/liver_enzyme_liz
ALT dropped 34 to 19. The fatty-liver story is the underrated one.
member · joined 14 Apr 2024
Comments — page 4 of 5
comment on the MASH question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/survodutide · 5 points · 8 months ago
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
comment on the lipids thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/bloodwork · 1 points · 8 months ago
the 22 month bloodwork check is the routine
comment on someone explain bloodwork to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/bloodwork · 3 points · 9 months ago
ALT is where the fatty-liver story shows up first
comment on [Meta] the eGFR rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/bloodwork · 1 points · 9 months ago
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
comment on [Lab] SGN survo — VendorInvestigate came back 99.0% against a claimed 99.1% in c/survodutide · 16 points · 9 months ago
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
comment on week one: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/newbiequestions · 82 points · 10 months ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on switched from 5mg to 2.5mg and the sulphur burps got better, not worse in c/newbiequestions · 416 points · 1 year ago
what is a COA — certificate of analysis, document from the lab
comment on why does nobody talk about biopsy in c/survodutide · 122 points · 1 year ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify ALT in c/bloodwork · 116 points · 1 year ago
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
comment on [Results] 61 weeks on 2.4mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/retatrutide · 0 points · 1 year ago
Which trial arm and what was the n?
comment on tried A1c for 9 weeks. here is what happened. in c/bloodwork · 13 points · 1 year ago
Do you have baseline to compare to?
comment on 6 months in and glucagon is still the thing I get wrong in c/survodutide · 20 points · 1 year ago
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for ferritin posts in c/bloodwork · 40 points · 1 year ago
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
comment on [Meta] the state board rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/compounding · 53 points · 1 year ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on anyone else notice retatrutide kicking in around week 49 in c/retatrutide · 0 points · 1 year ago
the weight curves are unusually steep, which makes predicting individual response harder
comment on three years of biopsy threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/survodutide · 122 points · 1 year ago
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about ALT in c/bloodwork · 11 points · 1 year ago
Same lab both times?
comment on A1c vs baseline labs — genuinely asking which matters more in c/bloodwork · 8 points · 1 year ago
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
comment on compounding — 17 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/compounding · 480 points · 1 year ago
shortage list status is 503A, check the actual list
comment on France: survodutide, and what it actually costs here in c/survodutide · 19 points · 1 year ago
phase 6 data is interesting, phase 18 will be different