u/old_account_2023
Been here since the first week. It was 40 people and a wiki stub.
long-standing contributor · joined 11 Aug 2023
Comments — page 3 of 3
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about basics until somebody posts a number in c/newbiequestions · 47 points · 11 months ago
The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.
comment on reading identity threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/researchpeptides · 17 points · 1 year ago
Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.
comment on [Question] Australia — has anyone got a straight answer on secretagogue in c/researchpeptides · 43 points · 1 year ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
comment on [Question] Australia — has anyone got a straight answer on secretagogue in c/researchpeptides · 62 points · 1 year ago
purity and identity are two questions
comment on [Meta] the identity rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/researchpeptides · 1 points · 1 year ago
research use only, handling and analysis, not administration
comment on [Lab] 12th independent test on BCH, and the trend is the interesting part in c/newbiequestions · 161 points · 1 year ago
the beginner question is not dumb
comment on France: survodutide, and what it actually costs here in c/survodutide · -30 points · 1 year ago
hepatic fat and survodutide are the story
comment on small win: goal weight stopped being a problem at week 20 in c/maintenancephase · 104 points · 1 year ago
the plateau is where the learning happens
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about thymosin until somebody posts a number in c/researchpeptides · 1 points · 1 year ago
focus on identity verification, handling, evidence state
comment on why does nobody talk about secretagogue in c/researchpeptides · 468 points · 1 year ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on 10 months in and week one is still the thing I get wrong in c/newbiequestions · 1 points · 1 year ago
what is titration — it means going slow on the escalation
comment on genuine question about glucagon that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/survodutide · 24 points · 2 years ago
Yeah, glucagon co-agonism is genuinely different.
Adding to this: hepatic fat is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for long term posts in c/maintenancephase · 26 points · 2 years ago
food noise returns but not always immediately
comment on basics — my 24-week log, condensed into one table in c/newbiequestions · 10 points · 2 years ago
Are you on a pen or vial?
comment on reading survodutide threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/survodutide · 4 points · 2 years ago
phase 12 data is interesting, phase 34 will be different
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify normal in c/newbiequestions · 25 points · 2 years ago
Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.
comment on my ApoB moved and I cannot work out whether research peptides is why in c/researchpeptides · 11 points · 2 years ago
not approved for human use, full stop
comment on [Lab] 22th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part in c/newbiequestions · 62 points · 2 years ago
the normal question is not dumb
comment on tried meta for 20 weeks. here is what happened. in c/meta · 10 points · 2 years ago
the wiki is the source
comment on am I the only one who found disclosure harder than the injections in c/meta · 267 points · 2 years ago
This is correct. Modmail first.