GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
563
c/meta·posted 2 years ago by u/tomas_lundgren

tried meta for 20 weeks. here is what happened.

Announcement Slow Clap ×1

Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful.

Setup: 10mg, week 31, injection-site soreness present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable — disclosure — and tracked it for 19 weeks.

Result: a difference, but a small one, and well inside what I would call noise if someone else posted it. So I am putting it here rather than presenting it as a finding. If two or three other people have done the same thing we might actually learn something.

Not medical advice, obviously. This is one person with a spreadsheet.

740 up / 177 down81% upvoted22 commentsid 9oqyqu10 Dec 2023

22 comments

22 in this archive, depth 4

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/sterile_field_steph47 points·2 years ago
this is why i still read c/maintenancephase
replysharereportpermalink
u/hub_opsMOD26 points·2 years ago

Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]18 points·2 years ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
u/stablecoin_steve21 points·2 years ago

The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.

replysharereportpermalink
u/vikram_mbeki11 points·2 years ago

sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly

replysharereportpermalink
u/tomas_lundgrenOP9 points·2 years ago

sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

replysharereportpermalink
u/dose_creep_dan25 points·2 years ago
no
replysharereportpermalink
u/halima_boateng17 points·2 years ago·edited

Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.

replysharereportpermalink
u/dose_creep_dan5 points·2 years ago

the ranking formula is meta

replysharereportpermalink
u/camila_marchand22 points·2 years ago

Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with moderation, not with what you concluded.

replysharereportpermalink
u/tomas_lundgren18 points·2 years ago

I am going to push back on this slightly.

replysharereportpermalink
u/tomas_lundgrenOP8 points·2 years ago

the rules question is policy, not individual

replysharereportpermalink
u/hub_opssite staff8 points·2 years ago

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/old_account_202310 points·2 years ago

the wiki is the source

replysharereportpermalink
u/dario_ibarra12 points·2 years ago

Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with meta, not with what you concluded.

replysharereportpermalink
u/enzo_petrescu9 points·2 years ago·edited

Disagree.

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 27 weeks to accept.

replysharereportpermalink
u/mod_ambulatoryadmin5 points·2 years ago

the wiki is the source

replysharereportpermalink
u/enzo_petrescu4 points·2 years ago

Slight fix: the number was 98.7, not 99.0. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

replysharereportpermalink
u/divya_bakken10 points·2 years ago

I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.

replysharereportpermalink
u/kaia_fonseca5 points·2 years ago

the site talking about itself

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (2) →
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.