my ALT moved and I cannot work out whether meta is why
Been lurking in c/tapering for about 13 months and finally have something worth posting.
Short version: week 52, 1.0mg, and rules is the bit I still cannot get a straight answer on. I have read the wiki, I have read the last 29 threads, and the answers split roughly down the middle.
What I actually want to know is whether the people saying it does not matter have measured it, or whether it is just repeated confidently. Happy to be told I am overthinking this — I probably am — but I would rather overthink it now than at week 58.
best — the order this archive was captured in
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
Crossposting this to c/researchpeptides because the people who need it are not reading this community.
the ranking formula is wiki
Did anything else change in the same window?
sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
[deleted]
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
Strongly agree. Transparency wins.
moderation appeals go through modmail first
Strongly agree. Transparency wins.
- 1sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly8 comments in this branch · started by u/discount_math_dm