GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of my ALT moved and I cannot work out whether meta is why — 37 comments in the full submission. View in context.
2k
c/meta·submitted 1 year ago by u/marisol_frisk

my ALT moved and I cannot work out whether meta is why

Discussionbranch of 8 comments

Been lurking in c/tapering for about 13 months and finally have something worth posting. Short version: week 52, 1.0mg, and rules is the bit I still cannot get a straight answer on. I have read the wiki, I have read the last 29 threads, and the answers split roughly down the middle. What I actually want to know is…

Read the full submission and all 37 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 1 year ago
u/discount_math_dm38 points·1 year ago

sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly

replysharereportpermalink
u/hub_opsMOD20 points·1 year ago

This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]14 points·1 year ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
u/lucia_balogun7 points·1 year ago

That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.

replysharereportpermalink
u/kian_solberg11 points·1 year ago

Strongly agree. Transparency wins.

replysharereportpermalink
u/blunt_coldbox_20246 points·1 year ago

the moderation decision is logged

replysharereportpermalink
u/RetaAndRegret25 points·1 year ago

moderation appeals go through modmail first

replysharereportpermalink
u/draw_up_dizzy2 points·1 year ago·edited

Strongly agree. Transparency wins.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/meta
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/hub_opsu/mod_ambulatoryu/rulebook_rachaelu/quiet_moderator
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →