[Meta] the identity rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining
Confession thread, sort of.
I went from 1.7mg to 0.25mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 10 weeks later, at which point I had no way of knowing whether the dose increase did anything or whether it would have broken anyway.
So now I have reflux I did not need and a data point I cannot interpret. Two lessons in one.
Posting it in the hope that somebody at week 40 reads it before doing the same thing.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.
not approved for human use, full stop
not approved for human use, full stop
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 92 weeks to accept.
The thing nobody prepared me for was the quiet. Not the appetite, the quiet. The constant negotiation in my head about food just stopped.
Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.
not approved for human use, full stop
The thing nobody prepared me for was the quiet. Not the appetite, the quiet. The constant negotiation in my head about food just stopped.
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
evidence-level statements required: in vitro, rodent, or human
thymosin fragments, GH secretagogues, secretagogue, long tail
Yeah, identity is the first question.
purity and identity are two questions
purity and identity are two questions
Disagree on that part. 98.7% and 98.9% on the same vial is normal.
the 5-letter analogs are speculative
research use only, handling and analysis, not administration
Has anyone actually got this in writing, or is it forum lore at this point?
the research peptides literature is thin on humans
How many weeks between the two measurements?
name the compound precisely, TB-500 and Thymosin Beta-4 are not the same
Did anything else change in the same window?
thymosin fragments, GH secretagogues, TB-500, long tail
[removed by moderator]
purity and identity are two questions
This is correct. Name it precisely.
research use only, handling and analysis, not administration
name the compound precisely, TB-500 and Thymosin Beta-4 are not the same
- 1evidence-level statements required: in vitro, rodent, or human10 comments in this branch · started by u/chain_confirm_c
- 2name the compound precisely, TB-500 and Thymosin Beta-4 are not the same8 comments in this branch · started by u/line_demir