u/pavel_kravchenko

This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.

Strongly agree. NHS is region-specific.

Are we talking 503A or 503B?

Retitled to remove editorialising.

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 54 weeks to accept.

name your province, coverage is provincial

Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.

did they reship, credit, or ghost you?

Disagree on that part. 98.7% and 98.4% on the same vial is normal.

This is correct. Private and NHS pathways are different.

Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.

the Scottish pathway is different from the English one

Strongly agree. Zero human controlled data.

sarcopenia is the unsolved question

state board rules differ, say which state

is this normal week 18 — yes, probably

Strongly agree. No question is dumb here.

provincial formularies differ sharply

Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.

cycle changes are real and under-researched

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.

the tier 3 pathway is the only free route, it is slow