u/quiet_reader_99
99 comments, 4 posts, mostly here to learn.
member · joined 11 Jul 2024
Overview — page 5 of 5
comment on does purity actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/hplc · 77 points · 11 months ago
Small correction: the trial was 6 weeks, not 39. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on three years of purity threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/hplc · 27 points · 1 year ago
Detection wavelength? integration and that changes at different wavelengths.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring integration at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/hplc · 9 points · 1 year ago
Small correction: the trial was 20 weeks, not 38. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on bacteriostatic water: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/reconstitution · 5 points · 1 year ago
Cosigning. The concentration on the vial in marker is load-bearing.
comment on bacteriostatic water: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/reconstitution · 6 points · 1 year ago
more water means more units for the same dose, which means finer resolution
comment on genuine question about TGA that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/glp1aus · 13 points · 1 year ago
New Zealand is different on the two sides
comment on [Discussion] private plan is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/glp1canada · 4 points · 1 year ago
public coverage status differs
comment on [Discussion] private plan is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/glp1canada · 5 points · 1 year ago
the 19 province variation is real
comment on week 46 check-in — 37kg down, early fullness manageable, one thing confusing me in c/tapering · 131 points · 1 year ago
Retitled to remove editorialising.
Disagree on that part. 96.8% and 96.2% on the same vial is normal.
comment on help me understand reship, I have read the wiki twice in c/intlshipping · 33 points · 1 year ago
Crossposting this to c/glp1aus because the people who need it are not reading this community.
comment on New Zealand: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/glp1aus · 44 points · 1 year ago
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
comment on concentration — 20 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/reconstitution · 1.4k points · 1 year ago
Cosigning. The concentration on the vial in marker is load-bearing.
comment on formulary — 13 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/glp1canada · 42 points · 1 year ago
Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.
comment on DHL vs transit time — genuinely asking which matters more in c/intlshipping · 26 points · 1 year ago
comment on bacteriostatic water vs units — genuinely asking which matters more in c/reconstitution · 54 points · 1 year ago
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
comment on week 61 check-in — 17kg down, fatigue manageable, one thing confusing me in c/hplc · 1 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, the chromatogram profile matters more than the headline number.
comment on tried shipping for 11 weeks. here is what happened. in c/intlshipping · 29 points · 1 year ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on unpopular opinion: integration is massively overrated in c/hplc · 50 points · 1 year ago
instrument quality is less important than analyst consistency
comment on the Netherlands: mg/mL, and what it actually costs here in c/reconstitution · 101 points · 1 year ago
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
comment on the Netherlands: mg/mL, and what it actually costs here in c/reconstitution · 155 points · 1 year ago
dosing errors come from people reconstituting two vials differently and forgetting which is which