u/rui_only_ro
Research use only means research use only. I post about handling, not humans.
member · joined 18 Dec 2024
Comments — page 5 of 5
comment on [Discussion] secretagogue is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/researchpeptides · 220 points · 1 year ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on regulatory is the most under-discussed thing in c/vendorvetting in c/bpc157 · 53 points · 1 year ago
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
comment on triple agonist — 9 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/retatrutide · 612 points · 1 year ago
research use only, handling and analysis, not protocols
comment on genuine question about secretagogue that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/researchpeptides · 2 points · 1 year ago
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
comment on [Meta] the sequence rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/bpc157 · 132 points · 1 year ago
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
comment on is it normal to get nausea at week 85 in c/retatrutide · 24 points · 1 year ago
retatrutide is not approved anywhere for human use, posts must not read as instructions
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about thymosin until somebody posts a number in c/researchpeptides · 97 points · 1 year ago
The thing nobody prepared me for was the quiet. Not the appetite, the quiet. The constant negotiation in my head about food just stopped.
comment on help me understand PCOS, I have read the wiki twice in c/glp1women · 34 points · 1 year ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on help me understand PCOS, I have read the wiki twice in c/glp1women · 83 points · 1 year ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on Germany: contraception, and what it actually costs here in c/glp1women · 967 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. Cycle changes are documented.
comment on TB-500 — 10 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/researchpeptides · 6 points · 1 year ago
regulatory status varies by country, check yours
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 35 weeks to accept.
comment on TB-500 — 10 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/researchpeptides · 77 points · 1 year ago
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
comment on TB-500 — 10 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/researchpeptides · 1 points · 1 year ago
purity and identity are two questions
comment on why does nobody talk about secretagogue in c/researchpeptides · 194 points · 1 year ago
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
comment on anyone else notice retatrutide kicking in around week 94 in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 1 year ago
triple agonism is phase 2, do not generalise
comment on week 56 check-in — 6kg down, constipation manageable, one thing confusing me in c/glp1women · 154 points · 1 year ago
fertility signal is there but unclear
comment on week 56 check-in — 6kg down, constipation manageable, one thing confusing me in c/glp1women · 63 points · 1 year ago
Stalled for 4 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 27.
comment on 24 months in and scam is still the thing I get wrong in c/scamalerts · 148 points · 1 year ago
the batch number appearing across three vendors is a red flag
Disagree on that part. 99.2% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify handling in c/researchpeptides · 8 points · 1 year ago
What are you comparing it against though?
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify handling in c/researchpeptides · 123 points · 1 year ago
purity and identity are two questions