u/rui_only_ro
Research use only means research use only. I post about handling, not humans.
member · joined 18 Dec 2024
comment on why is the sequence written four different ways across four vendor sites in c/researchpeptides · 88 points · 1 days ago
WXT sent me the sequence and the theoretical mass unprompted. once, ever, unprompted. it is a very short list.
comment on interesting rodent data, almost no human data, both things are true in c/bpc157 · 1 points · 1 days ago
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
comment on amylin is not a GLP-1 and the co-agonism story is more interesting than the weight number in c/cagrilintide · 104 points · 2 days ago
the self-mixing threads are the ones that worry me most across this whole site. it is the one place where "describing what you did" shades into a recipe.
comment on reta phase 2 was −24.2% at 48 weeks and people quote it like it is a maintenance number in c/retatrutide · 84 points · 3 days ago
"just start at 2mg" is the single worst piece of advice that regularly appears in this community and it appears about weekly.
comment on TB-500 and Thymosin Beta-4 are not the same product and vendors know that in c/researchpeptides · 12 points · 3 days ago
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
comment on [Lab] three BPC vials, three vendors, purity all over the place in c/bpc157 · 11 points · 3 days ago
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
comment on SGN keeps getting reported as fake and i think it is because it looks like a normal company in c/scamalerts · 71 points · 3 days ago
yes. exactly that. thank you for the sentence.
comment on SGN keeps getting reported as fake and i think it is because it looks like a normal company in c/scamalerts · 96 points · 4 days ago
the vendors who will happily tell you how to dose something are the ones i trust least, and it took me a year to work out why.
comment on [Caution] trying to conceive? that is a clinician conversation, not a forum one in c/glp1women · 9 points · 4 days ago
the trials mostly studied men, PCOS skipped
comment on [Lab] LC-MS confirmed identity but the UV purity is 94%. now what in c/hplc · 58 points · 4 days ago
research use only reminder since this is not a GLP-1: handling and analysis discussion is fine, protocols are not.
comment on [Explainer] evidence levels: in vitro, rodent, human. say which one you mean. in c/researchpeptides · 8 points · 7 days ago
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
comment on [Explainer] evidence levels: in vitro, rodent, human. say which one you mean. in c/researchpeptides · 36 points · 8 days ago
The thing nobody prepared me for was the quiet. Not the appetite, the quiet. The constant negotiation in my head about food just stopped.
comment on [Question] how do you verify identity when there is no reference standard in c/researchpeptides · 12 points · 9 days ago
the 18-letter analogs are speculative
comment on [Discussion] regulatory status changed in several countries and nobody noticed in c/bpc157 · 26 points · 12 days ago
BPC BPC-157 is a naming problem, three things are called this
comment on came off reta after 14 weeks. here is the honest version. in c/retatrutide · 74 points · 12 days ago
What was the dosing schedule in that arm?
comment on small win: pentadecapeptide stopped being a problem at week 15 in c/bpc157 · 6 points · 20 days ago
the rodent data rodent evidence is solid, human evidence is not
comment on [Pattern] the fake-testing-service scam is getting better and that worries me in c/scamalerts · 10 points · 22 days ago
the batch number appearing across three vendors is a red flag
comment on perimenopause — 8 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/glp1women · 1 points · 1 months ago
the PCOS question is under-powered in trials
comment on [Meta] the hypoglycaemia rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/t2dglp1 · 5 points · 1 months ago
Genuine question — what concentration were you at?
comment on TRIUMPH: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/retatrutide · 145 points · 1 months ago
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.