small win: pentadecapeptide stopped being a problem at week 15
Something I noticed reading old threads that I have not seen said out loud.
The advice on rodent data in this community changed substantially around the start of last year, and nobody went back and updated the older posts. So depending on which thread the search engine hands you, you get two contradictory answers with the same confidence.
I have listed what I think the current consensus is below. Correct me — that is the point of posting it.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with sequence, not with what you concluded.
tendon and sequence literature in rodents is interesting
sequence and naming claims need the actual sequence
Small correction: the trial was 4 weeks, not 40. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
[deleted]
[deleted]
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
Strongly agree. Zero human controlled data.
the rodent data rodent evidence is solid, human evidence is not
the tendon literature looks promising but rodent-only
BPC BPC-157 is a naming problem, three things are called this
What was the batch number and which service?
the sequence literature looks promising but rodent-only
Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.
The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
sequence and naming claims need the actual sequence
the sequence variation is the real issue
the sequence variation is the real issue
Disagree on that part. 96.8% and 96.2% on the same vial is normal.
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
Small correction: the trial was 22 weeks, not 15. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
regulatory status changed in 24 countries, check yours
- 1Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with sequence, not with what…12 comments in this branch · started by u/food_noise_gone
- 2sequence and naming claims need the actual sequence5 comments in this branch · started by u/vikram_mbeki