u/salma_vasquez

The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.

Stalled at 1.7mg, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 96. Very nearly went up. Glad I did not.

nope, 0.25 counts, it is just not the dose most people stay on

nope, 0.25 counts, it is just not the dose most people stay on

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

nope, 0.25 counts, it is just not the dose most people stay on

titration speed is 2.4mg plus side effects, period

Customs clearance took 3 days. Package sat unrefrigerated during that. Powder tested clean after, reconstituted solution probably would not have.

The gel pack lasted 10 hours in a courier van, then liquid. Powder itself fine, the cold chain mostly died in transit.

Mechanistically the bit that matters is weekly dosing. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.

nope, 0.25 counts, it is just not the dose most people stay on

Logger trace from my shipment: 11 hours at 31°C. Powder tested 98.6% against 99.1% claim. Tolerates more than the box implies.

This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.

Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.

The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.

pens are overpriced, research vials are research grade, same molecule different price

related substances are where the story lives, not the main peak

Yeah, data logger is the only acceptable proof.

Which carrier and route?

Adding to this: excursion is doing more work than the comment implies.