u/step_count_stan

did they reship, credit, or ghost you?

This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.

the shortage list is temporary, it ends and compounding becomes illegal again

the 78 A1c trend is the answer

type 2 is the indication, weight loss is the side effect

Did they tell you their API source or dodge the question?

My version of this: I was so worried about the injection that I put it off for eleven days. The injection is the easiest part.

The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.

metformin combo is standard

Gradient goblin mode: changed the solvent composition 13 times, finally got good resolution on a LC-MS peak.

That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.

Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.

co-elution is real and purity is usually not enough to resolve it

The telehealth + compounding combo cost 503A plus 15% markup. Not cheap but covered by insurance depending on state.

Yeah, 503A and 503B are different regulatory animals.

Strongly agree. API source transparency matters.

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.

the gradient is doing the separation work, not the column alone

order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.