[Lab] 13th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part
hypoglycaemia. That is the whole post, but I will justify it.
Everything else people worry about in c/meta is downstream of it. Titration speed, muscle cramps, the endless dose arguments — most of it resolves if you sort hypoglycaemia out first, and almost nobody does.
I say this having got it wrong for 18 months. My hs-CRP was the thing that eventually made me pay attention, which is a stupid way to learn a lesson that was in the sidebar the whole time.
best — the order this archive was captured in
post A1c with units and assay date
[deleted]
Strongly agree. A1c matters as much as weight.
insulin and sulfonylurea interactions are real hypo risk
The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
Genuine question — what concentration were you at?
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
Strongly agree. A1c matters as much as weight.
Week 61 for me and the honest summary is: 22kg down, muscle cramps manageable, and I have thought about food maybe four times today.
glycaemic control first, that is the original indication
I am going to push back on this slightly.
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
- 1post A1c with units and assay date7 comments in this branch · started by u/fridge_door_no
- 2glycaemic control first, that is the original indication4 comments in this branch · started by u/reship_roulette