u/cormac_danquah
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Oulu.
member · joined 15 Jun 2025
comment on [PBS] listing status and what it actually does to out-of-pocket in c/glp1aus · 2 points · 2 days ago
the regulatory New Zealand is the blocker
comment on [CGM] what the postprandial curve actually looks like before and after in c/t2dglp1 · 1 points · 2 days ago
Strongly agree. A1c matters as much as weight.
comment on [Caution] stacking with a sulfonylurea is a real hypo risk, not a theoretical one in c/t2dglp1 · -32 points · 3 days ago
Yeah, glycaemic control is the original use.
comment on [Trial Data] phase 2 biopsy endpoints, and what "resolution" means in c/survodutide · 6 points · 4 days ago
do not generalise from tirzepatide
comment on [Discussion] the weight conversation drowns out the glycaemic one in c/t2dglp1 · 51 points · 12 days ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on [Results] 42 weeks, 31kg, and dual agonist was the hard part in c/survodutide · 13 points · 19 days ago
the safety profile is not just tirzepatide amplified
comment on [Management] injection site rotation map, zero lumps in 14 months in c/sideeffects · 59 points · 20 days ago
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with reflux, not with what you concluded.
comment on three years of TGA threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/glp1aus · 24 points · 1 months ago
Slight fix: the number was 99.0, not 98.9. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on three years of TGA threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/glp1aus · 2 points · 1 months ago
unfunded-means-full-price is the NZ reality
comment on [Meta] the hypoglycaemia rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/t2dglp1 · 79 points · 1 months ago
This is correct. Hypo risk is real.
comment on stalled for 9 weeks at 12.5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/survodutide · 10 points · 1 months ago
not approved, descriptive posts only
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify below spec in c/darkspot · 43 points · 1 months ago
Did anything else change in the same window?
comment on 20 months in and A1c is still the thing I get wrong in c/t2dglp1 · 32 points · 2 months ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on [Vendor] QST order #13 — Denmark, 39 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/sideeffects · 51 points · 2 months ago
The the food-noise thing was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. Week 68 me did not think I would make it to week 25.
comment on unpopular opinion: nausea is massively overrated in c/sideeffects · 61 points · 2 months ago
Disagree.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 47 weeks to accept.
comment on [Results] 51 weeks on 2.4mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/t2dglp1 · 49 points · 3 months ago
Rodent data is rodent data.
Disagree on that part. 94.2% and 95.1% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Question] New Zealand — has anyone got a straight answer on constipation in c/sideeffects · 50 points · 5 months ago
the food-noise thing stops around week 48 for most people
comment on small win: A1c stopped being a problem at week 50 in c/t2dglp1 · 13 points · 5 months ago
Maintenance for 8 months now. Weight moves within about 3kg and the dose is a quarter of what it peaked at.
comment on below spec — 5 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/darkspot · 106 points · 5 months ago
Which country? Half the answers in this thread only apply in Canada.
comment on [Results] 6 weeks on 0.25mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/glp1aus · 81 points · 5 months ago
This is correct. PBS listings matter.