u/tomas_lundgren

Yeah, the evidence standard works.

Crossposting this to c/semaglutide because the people who need it are not reading this community.

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 5 weeks to accept.

multiple batches from GGPeps show a spread, that is the data

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds

oral non-peptide agonist is ACHIEVE, no food restrictions

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 96 weeks to accept.

Yeah, the incretin mechanism is doing the work here.

This is correct. Rodent data is investigational, not predictive.

sock puppet accounts ask the same leading questions

sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

I am going to push back on this slightly.

the rules question is policy, not individual

This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.

Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.

the moderation decision is logged