tried test results for 18 weeks. here is what happened.
Right, the purity question again, but with numbers this time.
I have 2 data points over 24 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.
The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 47, not week 96. People give up long before the interesting part.
Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Is that 97.9% area or mass?
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
KP / BPC / batch 12 / Janoshik / 98.9% — that is the shape
Yeah, the Medutest number matching the claim is the actual signal.
Is that 98.4% area or mass?
QYB / BPC / batch 23 / PeptideMeter / 97.9% — that is the shape
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts
below-spec results get logged, not dismissed
below-spec results get logged, not dismissed
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
do not editorialise in the title, put the number in the title and the opinion in the body
Is that 98.4% area or mass?
Strongly agree. Below-spec results matter as much as good ones.
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
TFC product, Medutest test, 98.7% result, batch 7, 13 days in transit. Logged.
MKM product, Medutest test, 95.1% result, batch 2, 32 days in transit. Logged.
below-spec results get logged, not dismissed
Is that 99.2% area or mass?
the VendorInvestigate and VendorInvestigate results differ by 18 points, both inside inter-lab variance
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
the vial you ordered versus the vial you received might be different batches
Which PeptideMeter service and what method did they use?
template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result
Yeah, the Medutest number matching the claim is the actual signal.
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
- 1This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.8 comments in this branch · started by u/nayeli_iyer
- 2Is that 97.9% area or mass?7 comments in this branch · started by u/camila_mensa