u/tove_ogunleye

area% is not mass%, and here is exactly why it matters

This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.

Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.

503B compounding is different from 503A, different rules, different legality

Adding to this: shortage list is doing more work than the comment implies.

purity and net content are two different numbers, same vial

Customs held the package for 8 days. No problems, just time. Factor it into expectations.

Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.

Yeah, the lane data is more useful than single reports.

Customs held the package for 21 days. No problems, just time. Factor it into expectations.

telehealth prescriber models exist, pricing differs by state

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 94 weeks to accept.

Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.

Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.

Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.

telehealth prescriber models exist, pricing differs by state

press release hazard ratio posts must be flaired until a publication exists

the Poland situation is different from the US, different regulations

SURMOUNT-4 discontinuation arm showed regain. That is the reality of a chronic disease treatment, not a failure.

SELECT reported a SELECT hazard ratio but the absolute event rate is what changes clinical practice.