[Lab] SGN survo — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 94.2%
I have had 7 orders now and I keep a table, so here is the honest summary rather than a vibe.
Material has been consistent. Communication has not. Shipping has varied by about 36 days on nominally the same lane, which matters more in summer than in February.
The independent number came back 97.9% against a claimed 98.0%, which I read as agreement rather than a discrepancy — inter-lab variance on this assay is a point or two either way and treating one lab as ground truth is how people end up in pointless arguments with vendors.
Batch number is in the comments. Ask if you want the method.
best — the order this archive was captured in
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
API transparency is the question that separates good compounders from sketchy ones
This is correct. The shortage list does expire and the rules change.
This is correct.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
shortage list status is shortage list, check the actual list
state board rules differ, say which state
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
state board rules differ, say which state
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
API source questions are on-topic and compounders dodging them is newsworthy
Asked 19 compounders about API source. One told me, one dodged, one said they cannot say. The answer is the signal.
What is the actual shortage list status right now?
the Poland situation is different from the US, different regulations
shortage list status is shortage list, check the actual list
- 1This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please…5 comments in this branch · started by u/quiet_moderator