u/tuva_aalto
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Kochi.
member · joined 11 Feb 2025
comment on is 96.8% area% actually fine or am i being sold a rounding error in c/coa · -26 points · 4 days ago
This is the correct framing. The COA structure matters as much as the number.
comment on this COA has no batch number and no date. what am i even looking at in c/coa · 3 points · 6 days ago
no "is this good?" without saying what the compound and claimed purity are
comment on this COA has no batch number and no date. what am i even looking at in c/coa · 11 points · 6 days ago
Yeah, 96.8% area is not the problem, the missing impurity breakdown is the problem.
comment on [Confirmed] cloned storefront, same product photos, different checkout in c/scamalerts · 28 points · 8 days ago
[deleted]
Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 98.7% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [COA] what does "related substances 1.4%" actually mean for my vial in c/coa · 1 points · 12 days ago
What is the method line say? Not the technique, the actual method.
comment on [Regret] i ignored the abdominal pain for four days in c/darkspot · 20 points · 13 days ago
My version of this: I was so worried about the injection that I put it off for eleven days. The injection is the easiest part.
comment on [Suspicious] the same signature image on COAs from three vendors in c/coa · 2 points · 23 days ago
chromatogram or it did not happen
comment on is it normal to get the food-noise thing at week 40 in c/coa · 8 points · 2 months ago
the related substances line is where the story is
comment on anyone else notice lost money kicking in around week 80 in c/darkspot · 12 points · 2 months ago
tests that came back 95.1%
comment on [Question] Sweden — has anyone got a straight answer on fake COA in c/scamalerts · 58 points · 2 months ago
Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.
comment on COA is the most under-discussed thing in c/semaglutide in c/coa · 1 points · 2 months ago
purity and net content are two different numbers, same vial
comment on cloned site is the most under-discussed thing in c/hplc in c/scamalerts · 96 points · 2 months ago
This is evidence. The metadata is checkable and it is odd.
comment on anyone else notice prior authorization kicking in around week 69 in c/insurancefights · 47 points · 2 months ago
redact member ids and group numbers from every screenshot
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring denial at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/insurancefights · 157 points · 3 months ago
do not suggest misrepresenting a diagnosis, that is fraud
comment on 23 months in and Apotheke is still the thing I get wrong in c/glp1eu · 38 points · 3 months ago
the 10-country variation is the whole point
comment on [Question] New Zealand — has anyone got a straight answer on certificate of analysis in c/coa · 10 points · 3 months ago
PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds
comment on unpopular opinion: exit scam is massively overrated in c/scamalerts · 102 points · 4 months ago
This is evidence.
Adding to this: exit scam is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on [Results] 7 weeks, 41kg, and formulary was the hard part in c/insurancefights · 91 points · 5 months ago
Which state? Coverage varies.
comment on small win: fake COA stopped being a problem at week 55 in c/scamalerts · 23 points · 5 months ago
Did MKM respond or ghost you?
comment on nobody warned me about nausea and I would have liked the warning in c/coa · 61 points · 5 months ago
purity and net content are two different numbers, same vial