[Results] 92 weeks, 15kg, and BPC-157 was the hard part
Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful.
Setup: 5mg, week 54, constipation present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable — rodent data — and tracked it for 24 weeks.
Result: a difference, but a small one, and well inside what I would call noise if someone else posted it. So I am putting it here rather than presenting it as a finding. If two or three other people have done the same thing we might actually learn something.
Not medical advice, obviously. This is one person with a spreadsheet.
best — the order this archive was captured in
the sequence literature looks promising but rodent-only
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
You have restated the marketing copy.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
My version of this: I was so worried about the injection that I put it off for eleven days. The injection is the easiest part.
This is correct. The naming is genuinely confusing.
Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.
Mechanistically the bit that matters is pentadecapeptide. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
research use only, no human protocols, no injection instructions
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
BPC tendon is a naming problem, three things are called this
pentadecapeptide is BPC-157, the supply chain naming is a mess
BPC pentadecapeptide is a naming problem, three things are called this
- 1the sequence literature looks promising but rodent-only5 comments in this branch · started by u/tired_ledger_ftw