reading CagriSema threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly
I have had 10 orders now and I keep a table, so here is the honest summary rather than a vibe.
Material has been consistent. Communication has not. Shipping has varied by about 38 days on nominally the same lane, which matters more in summer than in February.
The independent number came back 93.7% against a claimed 94.2%, which I read as agreement rather than a discrepancy — inter-lab variance on this assay is a point or two either way and treating one lab as ground truth is how people end up in pointless arguments with vendors.
Batch number is in the comments. Ask if you want the method.
best — the order this archive was captured in
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
REDEFINE phase 6 readouts are interesting but 6 person CagriSema is different from 6 trial CagriSema.
the co-agonism question is real and interesting
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
tendon and CagriSema literature in rodents is interesting
the amylin agonist pool is small, community is cagrilintide
tendon and CagriSema literature in rodents is interesting
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
not approved anywhere, keep posts descriptive, not instructional
the mechanism is different, the side effect profile reflects it
This is correct. The co-agonism is real.
Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
- 1REDEFINE phase 6 readouts are interesting but 6 person CagriSema is…5 comments in this branch · started by u/zaid_balogun
- 2tendon and CagriSema literature in rodents is interesting5 comments in this branch · started by u/zeynep_duarte