what changed for me between week 30 and week 73
Confession thread, sort of. I went from 1.7mg to 0.25mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 5 weeks later, at which point I had no way of knowing whether the dose increase did anything or whether it would have broken anyway. So now I have sulphur…
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
the batch number or it did not happen
What were the related substances listed individually?
axis labels included, always
Not to be pedantic but batch and area percent are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
What were the related substances listed individually?
Adding to this: related substances is doing more work than the comment implies.
What were the related substances listed individually?
Are you looking at area% or net peptide content? Different numbers.
Yeah, 96.8% area is not the problem, the missing impurity breakdown is the problem.
area% is not mass%, and here is exactly why it matters
Slight fix: the number was 97.2, not 97.4. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
post the whole document, not the headline number
Slight fix: the number was 99.1, not 96.8. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
the counterion is part of the mass you paid for
no "is this good?" without saying what the compound and claimed purity are