three years of area percent threads, summarised so you do not have to read them
Quick one. Canada here.
water content works very differently where I live than in the threads that dominate the front page, and I keep seeing people confidently given advice that simply does not apply outside the US.
Specifics: the route I used took 19 weeks and cost roughly what I expected. The admin was worse than the cost. The thing that would have saved me the most time was knowing which document to ask for at the start.
Happy to answer questions from anyone in the same jurisdiction.
best — the order this archive was captured in
What is the method line say? Not the technique, the actual method.
the counterion is part of the mass you paid for
redact your own name, not the vendor's batch details
redact your own name, not the vendor's batch details
Disagree on that part. 95.1% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds
Cosigning. The batch number is load-bearing information.
PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds
the related substances line is where the story is
Four months on the site and I was confusing area% and mass% in every post I made. One explainer thread and it clicked.
Water content on the document? That affects your concentration math.
the batch number or it did not happen
the batch number or it did not happen
Adding to this: COA is doing more work than the comment implies.
the batch number or it did not happen Adding to this: COA is doing more work than the comment implies.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
the related substances line is where the story is
Water content on the document?
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
the related substances line is where the story is
PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds
chromatogram or it did not happen
Yeah, 96.8% area is not the problem, the missing impurity breakdown is the problem.
Cosigning. The batch number is load-bearing information.
- 1Water content on the document? That affects your concentration math.10 comments in this branch · started by u/santiago_szabo
- 2What is the method line say? Not the technique, the actual method.8 comments in this branch · started by u/janek_ferrari