anyone else notice water content kicking in around week 50
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: certificate of analysis matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 24 months without either producing anything. What would actually settle it is 27 people…
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
no "is this good?" without saying what the compound and claimed purity are
area% is not mass%, and here is exactly why it matters
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
no "is this good?" without saying what the compound and claimed purity are
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
the batch number or it did not happen
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
[deleted]
post the whole document, not the headline number
post the whole document, not the headline number
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 47 weeks to accept.
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.