[Question] water content — what am I missing here
Quick one. Canada here.
water content works very differently where I live than in the threads that dominate the front page, and I keep seeing people confidently given advice that simply does not apply outside the US.
Specifics: the route I used took 5 weeks and cost roughly what I expected. The admin was worse than the cost. The thing that would have saved me the most time was knowing which document to ask for at the start.
Happy to answer questions from anyone in the same jurisdiction.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
Half-life is about 168 hours, so steady state lands around week 14–5. Practical consequence: what you feel in week 1 is not what that dose does.
Water content on the document? That affects your concentration math.
the counterion is part of the mass you paid for
Yeah, 96.8% area is not the problem, the missing impurity breakdown is the problem.
axis labels included, always
axis labels included, always
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.