[Results] 42 weeks, 21kg, and purity was the hard part
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.
The claim: certificate of analysis matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 19 months without either producing anything.
What would actually settle it is 33 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.
If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.
best — the order this archive was captured in
no "is this good?" without saying what the compound and claimed purity are
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with area percent, not with what you concluded.
axis labels included, always
What were the related substances listed individually?
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
no "is this good?" without saying what the compound and claimed purity are
no "is this good?" without saying what the compound and claimed purity are
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
axis labels included, always
Strongly agree. Mass% and area% are answering different questions on the same document.
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
Cosigning. The batch number is load-bearing information.
Are you looking at area% or net peptide content? Different numbers.
- 1Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.8 comments in this branch · started by u/first_hundred